Before arrival
A clear, informed choice
Talk through your goals, support needs, accessibility, current providers, house expectations, costs, and what the home can safely offer. An interest inquiry is not admission or a reserved bed.
In development: Restoring Hope Community Homes is currently in the planning, partnership, fundraising, property-evaluation, and leadership-development stage. The first home is not yet open and is not currently accepting resident applications.
This notice will remain visible until the board formally approves opening and admissions.
Hope120 is the proposed women-first residence within Restoring Hope Community Homes. Its design brings a structured, substance-free living environment together with everyday skills, chosen recovery supports, and community belonging—not inpatient treatment, detoxification, hospitalization, or custodial care.
Residents will work with peers and qualified staff to develop individualized goals in areas such as:
Participation in spiritual activities will be voluntary. Clinical care will remain under properly licensed professionals, with informed consent and separate clinical records where required.
The proposed resident journey
The aim is more than a room: dependable people, everyday practice, and a realistic next step. Goals would be set with residents and revisited around days 30, 60, 90, and 120—not measured by attendance alone.
Before arrival
Talk through your goals, support needs, accessibility, current providers, house expectations, costs, and what the home can safely offer. An interest inquiry is not admission or a reserved bed.
Days 1–30
Settle into food, sleep, daily routines, and relationships. Create a resident-led plan, identify practical needs such as identification and transportation, and begin planning for your next home.
Days 31–90
Combine work or education with chosen recovery supports, practical skills, and appropriate care. Review what is helping and adapt the schedule for employment, disability, caregiving, or outside treatment.
Days 91–120
Work toward a realistic housing destination, income and benefits, transportation, medication access, continuing care, trusted contacts, and a written backup plan. Transition preparation begins well before this phase.
Day 120 is a milestone, not an automatic eviction. Individualized continuation and transition are part of the proposed model. Extensions, costs, and occupancy terms must be explained in the final lawful resident agreement; no particular extended stay is guaranteed.
A proposed orientation sequence, adapted to your immediate needs and pace. Urgent help would not wait for a particular day.
A personal welcome, food, orientation to shared and private spaces, emergency contacts, and time for questions.
Choose first-week priorities and discuss internal or outside supports without pressure to disclose your whole story.
Make a manageable list for identification, benefits, transportation, and appointments, with a named helper for each next step.
Agree on accessible household contributions and try a meal-planning, food-budgeting, or cooking activity.
Explore employment, education, or peer training at your pace; participation does not guarantee a job or course placement.
Choose a safe community connection or recreational activity and identify transportation or accessibility barriers.
Share what feels helpful, raise concerns, and agree on the next week’s priorities and support contacts.
Life in the home
Work, classes, outside appointments, rest, and disability accommodations come first in planning a realistic week. These examples explain the design; they are not a published timetable or evidence of current staffing.
Illustrative planning schedule • All daily times are Central Time.
6:30–9:00 AM
Breakfast, personal routine, work or class departure, and optional quiet reflection.
9:00 AM–Noon
Work, education, appointments, individualized life-skills practice, or needed rest.
Noon–2:00 PM
Lunch, errands, chosen appointments, or restorative personal time.
2:00–5:00 PM
Employment preparation, education, garden or creative learning, or individual support.
5:00–7:00 PM
A shared meal and accessible household contributions; personal disclosure is never required at meals.
7:00–9:00 PM
A selected group, recreation, safe family or community contact, or personal time.
9:00–11:00 PM
A calm environment, optional check-in, and preparation for the next day.
11:00 PM–6:30 AM
Rest with access to help under the eventual approved overnight staffing and emergency plan.
A weekly resident meeting would offer space to suggest changes, raise concerns, and plan shared responsibilities. Chores would be accessible and distinct from paid work; residents, students, volunteers, or cameras would not replace required trained staff.
Groups and practical learning
A small, guided conversation with a practical next step—not pressure to share a trauma story or prove your recovery. A facilitator would explain the purpose, choices, and limits of group confidentiality before inviting participation.
A brief invitation to say how you are doing; no forced disclosure.
Focused teaching, a reading, or an approved curriculum topic.
Guided conversation with room to listen, ask questions, or pass.
Try a communication skill, planning exercise, or other relevant activity.
Identify one manageable action and any support you want.
The September 2026 plan explores a 15-offering portfolio. The allocation below is one planning option—not an approved inventory. Only a smaller, funded schedule with confirmed facilitators, permissions, and demand would launch; each resident would select appropriate supports.
6 proposed curriculum slots
Faith-based learning and guided discussion around recovery-related life challenges. Exact titles, curriculum permissions, trained facilitators, and dates must be confirmed.
Explore Living Free →3 proposed track slots
Trauma-focused faith-based course options where audience fit, facilitator preparation, and demand support a cohort. A course is not a substitute for needed clinical trauma treatment.
Explore REBOOT →3 proposed nonclinical slots
Practice budgeting, planning meals, navigating resources, preparing for work, and communicating needs. Peers help with practical steps; they do not diagnose or provide psychotherapy.
Explore peer support →3 proposed flexible slots
Options for safe relationships, ongoing belonging, and specialized needs. Family contact and reconciliation follow resident choice and safety, not pressure.
Explore community involvement →Linked pages explain the wider ministry programs; they do not confirm an active Hope120 cohort or resident placement.
Resident-selected pathways that support whole-life recovery capital.
A calm environment with consistent rhythms, supportive bedding, quieter overnight practices, sleep education, and referral pathways for insomnia, sleep apnea, nightmares, and medication concerns.
Cooking, budgeting, food safety, gardening, meal planning, preserving food, and communal hospitality without food shame.
Accessible walking, movement, parks, and recreation chosen with residents. Potential YMCA participation depends on eligibility, actual rates, funding, transport, and confirmed arrangements—not an existing membership promise.
Resident-selected learning in art, writing, music, technology, trades, science, history, nature, financial literacy, and other interests.
Gardening, trail work, park and shoreline projects, conservation partnerships, outdoor skills, reflection, and sober recreation.
Exploration of employment, skilled trades, nonprofit leadership, ministry, pastoral formation, peer-support careers, education, and entrepreneurship.
Proposed employer connections could offer workplace-readiness learning or job shadowing under clear agreements. Resident choice, safe placements, and privacy come first; jobs and employer commitments are not guaranteed.
Support for boundaries, grief, parenting, letter writing, safe visitation, and healthy relationships. Reconciliation is never forced when contact is unsafe or unwanted.
Residents could contribute through house voice, community projects, and later supervised peer formation or alumni involvement. Training requires assessed competence and separate role approval; it does not automatically confer a state credential or employment.
A proposed physical environment intentionally shaped to support whole-life recovery capital. Final design will reflect site, code, accessibility, and board guidance.
A home in a quiet Green Bay-area neighborhood, designed for a small number of women residents so relationships and oversight remain personal rather than institutional.
Private and semi-private bedrooms with supportive bedding, storage for personal belongings, and calm sleep-supportive practices — residents help shape their own space.
A shared kitchen and dining area for cooking, budgeting, food-safety practice, meal planning, and unhurried communal hospitality without food shame.
A comfortable living room for house meetings, relationship-building, study, rest, and peer connection — the relational heart of the home.
A dedicated quiet space available for prayer, Scripture, journaling, telehealth counseling sessions, and private conversation. Use is always voluntary.
A community garden and outdoor area for stewardship, fresh air, movement, sober recreation, and rest — connected to the Nature Stewardship Corps pathway.
Secure entry, smoke and carbon-monoxide detectors, fire-safety planning, Naloxone availability and trained staff, and clear emergency protocols.
Accessibility-informed design wherever feasible, accommodations requested in good faith, and a physical environment that honors resident worth.
Recovery housing supports stable, substance-free living — it is not detox, inpatient treatment, hospitalization, or custodial care. Criteria below are proposed and will be finalized before the home opens.
Submission of an interest form or meeting proposed criteria does not guarantee a bed, housing, financial assistance, or acceptance. Each resident pathway will be developed individually and with care.
A proposed rhythm that protects sleep, safety, sobriety, relationships, and personal agency — within a Christ-centered, resident-honoring community.
No alcohol or illicit substances on the premises. Prescription and over-the-counter medications follow a clearly communicated safety protocol.
Residents manage their own medications with peer support and referral. A simple check-in protocol supports safety without removing personal responsibility.
A regular community meeting builds shared responsibility, surfaces needs early, and gives every resident a voice in the life of the home.
Consistent wake, meal, and rest rhythms support recovery. Overnight quiet hours protect sleep — a core recovery capital.
Chores, cooking, and light house care rotate among residents. Shared work builds dignity, agency, and belonging rather than obligation.
Each resident has individualized goals reviewed with peer or staff support — employment, education, health, relationships, faith, and transition planning.
Prayer, Scripture, chapel, and spiritual conversation are always available and never required. A resident may observe, question, or decline at any time.
Good-faith accountability, including possible substance screens, supports a trustworthy environment for everyone living in the home.
Clinical, medical, and psychiatric care remain with licensed professionals outside the home, with informed consent and separate records where required.
The proposed core journey is 120 days, with individualized continuation and transition rather than automatic departure on day 120. Extension criteria, fees, and lawful occupancy terms must be finalized in the resident agreement; no extended stay is guaranteed. Housing search, employment, savings, chosen care, and optional alumni connection begin during the core journey.
Support with clear boundaries
Trained peers would offer connection, encouragement, resource navigation, and help practicing daily skills. They do not diagnose, provide psychotherapy, or direct medication.
Residents could choose prayer, Scripture, pastoral conversation, or appropriately supervised student ministry care, with clear consent and an explanation of the provider’s role.
Assessment and treatment belong with appropriately authorized professionals. Care would depend on individual suitability, provider availability, consent, and funding—not simply on being a resident.
The plan calls for separate housing, care, school, employment, and donor records, with only appropriately authorized information shared for a specific purpose. A church sponsor, donor, employer, or teacher would not receive counseling notes simply because they support the program.
Transition planning would connect housing, work or education, benefits, transportation, chosen care, and safe relationships. Optional alumni follow-up is proposed at 30 and 90 days, then 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after exit. Residents could decline or withdraw, choose safe contact methods, and receive support without giving a public testimony.
Follow-up is not emergency monitoring. Future evaluation would consider dignity, choice, housing stability, learning, employment, and helpfulness of support, including missing responses and unplanned exits. Hope120 does not yet have operating outcomes to report.
The September 22, 2026 plan proposes a $400 first-month contribution. Months 2–4, what charges cover, hardship or deferral options, refunds, and later-stay terms still need approval. This is not a final fee schedule or a promise of financial assistance.
It is a proposed participant contribution for eligible supervised student biblical-counseling or chaplaincy sessions—not licensed psychotherapy or the full cost of care. Student readiness, supervision, consent, and funding must be in place. It is optional and is not the price of every RHM service.
No. The proposed framework invites prayer, Scripture, worship, and spiritual care without making religious performance a condition of housing or belonging. Each resident would have an individualized schedule, not an obligation to attend every offering.
The planning model accepts lawfully prescribed medication and supports appropriate outside providers. The final medication-storage and self-administration process requires review. Peers and students cannot change prescriptions or make clinical decisions.
The proposed resident-rights approach includes accessible complaints and accommodation requests, an independent reviewer when there is a conflict, and protection against retaliation. Testing, return-to-use, discharge, and reentry rules are still under review; draft rules are not final admission terms.
No. The September 2026 plan identifies Fall 2027 through January 2028 as a conditional planning window. A final site, permitted capacity, approvals, insurance, paid staffing and relief, resident safeguards, funding, and board authorization must be confirmed first.
Request opening and referral updates, ask about the proposed program, or explore a way to help. These are interest inquiries—not resident admission applications.
Based on the RHM Ministry Business Plan, leadership review edition, September 22, 2026, chapters 6–8, 15–18, and 20. This public summary describes proposed programming, not adopted policies, an approved budget, or authorization to open.
Restoring Hope Ministries believes every person is made in the image of God and possesses inherent dignity. Residents will never be reduced to a diagnosis, relapse, criminal history, financial condition, family circumstance, or level of church involvement.
Residents may engage, observe, question, or decline spiritual activities. No person should be pressured through housing, money, Scripture, donor relationships, or organizational authority.
The ministry’s shared faith commitments include:
Restoring Hope Ministries tracks the well-being of every participant in our clinical and faith-based services using empirically validated screeners, clinical interviews, behavioral analysis, and self-report — so we can honestly see whether the people we serve are getting better.
This rigor reflects the training of our founder, Dr. Jeffrey Gross, who earned an M.S. in Clinical Psychology from the Wisconsin School of Professional Psychology and is continuing his Psy.D. studies in Clinical Psychology, with completion anticipated in 2028. His Th.D. in Theology and Ph.D. in Christian Counseling complement that clinical education with theological preparation for Christ-centered soul care.
At Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin, he served as a Student Psychologist and later Chief Student Psychologist, supporting veterans and first responders with traumatic brain injuries through the BRAVE program. His work included assessment, individualized treatment planning, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, psychoeducational and process-oriented groups, and peer supervision. His experience also includes supervised psychological testing of clergy at Milwaukee Psychotherapy Collaborative, recovery-focused group development at The Manor by Windrose, and case management and peer-support supervision at Biehl Bridges to Recovery.
Continuing education in assessment, trauma, neurobehavioral conditions, supervision, ethics, and risk management further informs this approach. Together, these experiences help shape RHM’s commitment to careful assessment, responsible documentation, collaborative care, and attention to each person’s spiritual, relational, emotional, and practical needs. His clinical psychology doctorate remains in progress; this background does not replace the qualifications or licensure required for regulated clinical services.
